Here is a surprising story of censorship. The article also discusses how a
fundamentalist and self-contradictory interpretation of a particular
religion is imposed on all of society, with dramatic consequences for sexual health, democracy, and
freedom of expression.
The Internet provides
unprecedented opportunities to support freedom
of expression. Artists and writers can immediately reach a worldwide
audience. Social networks can spread news and trigger democratic revolutions
against totalitarian regimes. Can such a potentially positive tool be turned
into a weapon of mass control? Can it be used to enforce censorship? My literary dystopian novel “The Woman Who Sparked the Greatest Sex Scandal of All Time” explores these
questions. Ironically, the book itself has undergone censorship during its own
publishing process.
When I submitted the electronic
edition to Booktango, an aggregator
that distributes e-books to online retailers, it was rejected with the
following message, “The content was flagged as pornographic with very explicit
content and we are unable to proceed with its upload and publication. As per
Author Solutions policy goes: contents cannot be overly sexual. Booktango does
cater to erotic genres but erotica is completely different from pornography and
as far as the descriptions and content of the materials submitted, it all fell
under pornography. Please do understand that the main goal of Booktango is to
be an open website for authors whose intent is to share their art to the whole
world.”
I would never have expected my book to be considered pornographic. There are no illustrations or photos, and its cover shows only a woman’s face, extracted from a painting by Karina Vagradova. The novel was already available in print and Kindle editions from Amazon, where it was listed under both the Literary Fiction and Dystopian Science Fiction categories. In my opinion, its unconventional descriptions of explicit sex are not vulgar, and have an artistic purpose that is integral to the plot.
In any case, I can’t
help but notice the contradiction in Booktango’s message. They claim to provide
an open platform for publishing, yet they reject content based on puritanical
prejudices, thus missing an opportunity to truly support freedom of expression.
It is also of concern that the policies of Amazon and most US and UK online
bookstores also include a ban on pornographic text content, without a precise
definition of what that even means. So even a novel that has already been
published can be forced out of the market, arbitrarily, if it is reported on
the whim of any fundamentalist. In fact, that's what happened to a number of indie
authors that were accused by the British magazine The Kernel of promoting
rape, incest, pedophilia, and bestiality. However, the fictional description of
any such sexual misbehavior does not necessarily imply its promotion in
reality, just like crime fictions do not necessarily promote murder.
Remarkably, there is no restriction on detailing explicit violence, while
explicit sex is usually considered obscene even when it involves consenting
adults, as George R.R. Martin noted. Moreover, if there is one book that does indeed promote
rape and pedophilia in several passages, along with sexism, homophobia, and murder, it is the Bible. To be consistent, The Kernel should have asked for it to be banned as well. This is a major contradiction, since history
demonstrates that this sexophobic
censorship has its origin in a puritan
interpretation and seemingly selective reading of the Bible itself.
In fact, descriptions of explicit
sex can be found throughout the Pagan, Indian, and Islamic worlds, often within
works aimed at a general audience. This is the case, among many other examples,
of Petronius’s “Satyricon,” “The Kama Sutra,” “The Arabian Nights,” and the
verses of some of the most celebrated poets of Arab literature, such as Abu
Nuwas. On the other hand, the Christian world has oscillated between
condemnation and tolerance of explicit descriptions of sex acts. However much
the Church tried to ban Boccaccio’s “Decameron,” it was soon accepted by the
society and became a classic. Today, countries with a longstanding Catholic
tradition such as Spain do not censor explicit
sex in fiction.
Sexophobic censorship is also
imposed on images, in particular on book covers. In the United States and the
United Kingdom, they are not allowed to portray genitals. Female breasts are
also banned, adding an element of sexist
discrimination to the attack on the
freedom of the press. Surprisingly, these restrictions apply even to
artistic nudity. Again, history demonstrates that this censorship has its
origin in a fundamentalist interpretation of Christianity. In fact, graphic
nudity and sex scenes were common on the walls in the homes and streets of the
pagan Roman world. The Christian Renaissance did not censor the naked human bodies,
which were often represented even in churches. Only after the Lutheran
Reformation did Protestants ban nudity, with Catholics later following suit.
Genitals and female breasts on paintings from more tolerant times were then
covered with fig leaves. However, in the last century the Catholic Church has
restored the original pictures, removing the fig leaves. Genitals and breasts
have come back into the church, and they can be admired even in Michelangelo’s
Sistine Chapel, where new popes are elected. Today, major online newspapers and
magazines in Spain and Italy often publish pictures of nudity on their front
pages, without considering them pornographic and without worrying that they
will be seen by children.
In my opinion, imposing this puritan censorship on all of society is
a serious violation of secularism and freedom of expression, which are the
cornerstones of US and UK democracy. The purpose of not offending anyone is not
a good enough justification. Someone will always feel offended. An Islamic
fundamentalist could ask for women to be pictured with their hair covered, and
a follower of Wahhabism could go further and require a ban on any images of
females, regardless of how they are dressed. What is the limit? Fortunately,
there is a very simple solution. If they don’t want to be offended, people with
prudish sensibilities can just avoid buying the book or staring at the picture.
Rather, it is censorship itself that needs to be banned, since it offends
individual liberty.
Regrettably, explicit sex is made
taboo either by direct censorship,
or by confining it to the ghetto of adult-only genres such as Erotica. Most
authors in other genres self-censor themselves. Otherwise, their books could be
arbitrarily banned from some general searches, resulting in a less evident
censorship that can still make selling copies a hard task. Besides being antidemocratic, making sex taboo may cause an increase in
teenage pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases. This is one motivation for comprehensive sex education, which has also been argued to be a sexual assault prevention tool and a basic human right for today's youth.
Sex is an essential ingredient of
life, and it is worthy of being explicitly described in all genres of fiction.
Treating it as obscene is forcing life to become dirty and sinful from its
origin. The real sin is censorship, the true creator of obscenity. If God
exists, sex is Her gift, and it is not evil.
Eli Yaakunah’s novel “The Woman Who Sparked the Greatest Sex Scandal of AllTime” has been given
"The Kirkus Star," which is "Awarded to Books of Exceptional
Merit," and has been listed among the "Best Books of 2013"
by Kirkus Reviews.
Thank you for reading, sharing, and/or commenting this article. You can also repost it freely as a guest post on your blog, newspaper or magazine. Let’s stop sexophobia and sex censorship!
Thank you for reading, sharing, and/or commenting this article. You can also repost it freely as a guest post on your blog, newspaper or magazine. Let’s stop sexophobia and sex censorship!
Saw your post on my Book Blogs feed, though forgive me if my response is off. I had a hard time reading the font, but love your book cover, and post in spirit. One of the reasons sex crimes continue is due to this type censorship, or not broaching the topic candidly.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment! I agree with you, it seems that there is a correlation between making sex taboo and sex crimes. Besides, there is no reason for such censorship but a particular interpretation of a particular religion.
Delete